Deuterocanonical Books

This note is a draft, written from a Roman Catholic perspective—if you have additions or changes to suggest, please feel free to let me know.

The Deuterocanonical ("second canon") books of the Old Testament are considered canonical by Catholic and certain Orthodox Churches. Most Protestant ecclesial communities regard the deuterocanonical books as apocryphal, or not part of the canon of scripture.

In the first century there was not an "official" Jewish canon of scripture. Many of the first Christians, including the inspired authors of the New Testament, frequently quoted the Greek version of the Hebrew scriptures (Old Testament) commonly known at the time and referred to today as the Septuagint. The difference arises because the deuterocanonical books are present in the Greek Septuagint but not in various Hebrew manuscripts.

St. Jerome's fourth century Latin translation of the Bible, the Vulgate, was made from the Septuagint and therefore included the deuterocanonical books. (Interestingly, he apparently did not regard all of the Greek text canonical but was obedient to the Pope and included them.) The "official" canon of scripture grew out of this Tradition and was affirmed at various councils, including the Council of Trent.

Protestant rejection of the deuterocanonical books originates in Luther's labeling of these books as the Apocrphya and placing them between the Old and New Testaments.


Created: 2021-08-12-Thu
Updated: 2024-01-31-Wed