(San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1944/1994), 539
- Part One: Atheistic Humanism
- Chapter 1:
- Chapter 2:
- Chapter 3: The Spiritual Battle
- Part Two: \<a href="../notes/Auguste-Compte.html">Auguste Compte\</a> and Christianity
- Chapter 1: The Meaning of Comtian Atheism
- Chapter 2: Christianity and Catholicism
- Chapter 3: Positivist Transpositions
- Part Three: \<a href="../notes/Fyodor-Dostoevsky.html">Dostoevsky\</a> As Prophet
- Chapter 1: Comparison with
- Chapter 2: The Bankruptcy of Atheism
- Chapter 3: Experience of Eternity
- Mystical Confrontations
- Chapter 1: The Search for a New Man
- Chapter 2: \<a href="../notes/Nietzsche\.html">Nietzsche\</a> as Mystic
Part One: Atheistic Humanism
1. A Tragic Misunderstanding
Christianity puts forth a radical (to the ancients) view of man: both low in his fallenness and great in his redemption. But this liberation eventually started to feel like a yoke, leading to the atheism (really anti-theism) of absolute humanism.
2. Feuerbach and the Religious Illusion
Feuerbach is the link from Hegel to Marx. For him God is only the sum of the attributes of the greatness of man, and is then cast off. His goal is to reveal man's essence to give him faith in himself. Marx then takes the religious ideas of Feuerback and applies them to the social and political order, which has no God because it seeks to restore divinity to man.
3. Nietzsche and the "Death of God"
Nietzsche proclaimed the death of God as an act of the will—a murder—that urges man to greatness.
4. The Dissolution of Man
Where there is no God, there is no man. There is no longer any man because there is no longer anything that is greater than man.
Chapter 2: Nietzsche and Kierkegaard
1. The Birth of Tragedy
Nietzsche wrote his first work, The Birth of Tragedy, against the "myth-destroying" rationalism of Socrates. Man starved of myths is a man without roots.
2. Myth and Mystery
The Church affirms Nietzsche's intuition that we need something deeper than cold rationalism, but rejects his pagan myth for Christian mystery as explained by Péguy.
3. "Deeper Immersion in Existence"
Nietzsche and Kierkegaard both reject the rationalist "historicism" of Hegel. Kierkegaard is quite Socratic and he sees Christianity as a paradox (though he cannot be considered a teacher of the faith).
Chapter 3: The Spiritual Battle
Summary: Today's problems are spiritual in nature, and involve the very concept of man.
1. The Battlefield
Nietzsche directly rejected Christian ethics and a Christian concept of man. His attack is spiritual, and leads to the neopaganism of our age.
2. The Spirit of Christianity (★)
We must recognize our own shortcomings in living the Christian life and return to the spirit of Christianity: The Gospels.
Part Two: Auguste Compte and Christianity
Chapter 1: The Meaning of Comtian Atheism
1. The Law of the Three States
Compte's whole system can be viewed as the transition from the theological (fictitious) state, to the metaphysical (abstract) state, to the scientific (positive) state. This was his "law of intellectual evolution." This reduces man to no more than the subject of sociology.
2. The Monotheistic Transition
Monotheism is deplorable to Compte, and he mourns the "Western malady" that has occurred. Rather, he celebrates the "underlying kinship between positivism and fetishism."
3. Beyond Atheism
Compte leaves the "inadequate emancipation" of atheism behind: it is a purely negative system that cannot satisfy the moral and social needs the faith is denies does. We are left with the only one absolute principle: "everything is relative."
4. God Excluded and Replaced
God must be replaced if you don't want him to come back. Positivism replaces God with Humanity: it is the "Religion of Humanity."
Chapter 2: Christianity and Catholicism
1. Antisocial Christianity
Christian anthropology—the human person made in the image and likeness of God—makes the individual more important than the community.
2. Jesus and Saint Paul
Compte disparaged Jesus at every opportunity, but was enamored with "the incomparable Saint Paul."
3. The Work of the Catholic Priesthood
Compte admired the "social genius" of Catholicism, for example how the Catholic priesthood allowed for the separation of temporal and spiritual power. He saw Catholicism, in its "divinization" of man, as paving the way for Positivism as the Religion of Humanity.
4. A Holy Alliance
Compte saw Catholicism as an ally against, for example, Protestantism. He attempted—no joke—to lure some Jesuits into a coup against the Church.
Chapter 3: Positivist Transpositions
1. The True Catholicism
Compte admired aspects of Catholicism and modeled certain aspects of his Positivism after it. This cannot be taken seriously, however, as it grew out of his senility and his fundamental misunderstanding of the Gospel.
2. The Priesthood of the Scientists
Compte sought to create a Positive Priesthood—a "Priesthood of Humanity"—composed of scientists who would establish his order.
3. Spiritual Despotism
Compte saw no place of anything but blind faith and veneration from the followers of his Positivism, who would submit to any doctrine from his Priests, and ultimately to whatever he thought himself.
In Compte's Positivism, politics and religion are combined into a single "Sociocracy", with no concept of rights and all spiritual and temporal power concentrated. Interestingly, his primary men of action are to be bankers.
"The Positivism formula spells total tyranny."
Part Three: Dostoevsky As Prophet
Chapter 1: Comparison with Nietzsche
1. Hostile Brothers
Dostoevsky and Nietzsche both descended to the same depths of despair, and their response is what determines which of them is the real prophet of our time. It was Dostoevsky who chose God, and who's questions shake us out of our complacency and help us to understand him more fully.
2. The Torment of God
Dostoevsky enters into the depths of atheist doubt, as illustrated by his reaction to Holbein's painting of the dead Christ. He enters the depths of denial as with the Problem of Evil from the mouth of Ivan in The Brothers Karamazov, and while he does not provide answers, he shows how Jesus entered into our suffering and took evil upon his shoulders.
3. In the Presence of Jesus
While Nietzsche was jealous of Jesus to the point of madness, Dostoevsky encountered Christ in the Gospel in prison through knowing him comes to a deep understanding of the human person.
Chapter 2: The Bankruptcy of Atheism
1. The Man-God
Against the man-God (Jesus), Dostoevsky represents the god-man—the practitioner of atheist humanism—in characters such as Kirillov who kills himself to kill the fear of death and thus to kill God.
2. The Tower of Babel
The Tower of Babel represents atheist socialism. Against this, Dostoevsky shows that social systems with no Christian basis inevitable become systems of violence and slavery.
3. The Palace of Glass
Atheism built a "Palace of Glass", the universe of reason. But this inevitably becomes instead a palace a dark jail, and Dostoevsky ridicules those who allow themselves to become the slaves of science or philosophy. The "subterranean man" from _Notes from Underground_ shows man's freedom against the determinism of scientism. Man cannot live without God.
Chapter 3: Experience of Eternity
1. Ambiguous Experiences
Dostoevsky's holiness is ambiguous? This section didn't really click with me...
2. Dualisms and Symbols
Dostoevsky places parts of himself in his characters, and this along with his ambiguity is important to understand him.
3. The New Birth
Dostoevsky is profoundly Orthodox and shows how the ways in which God reaches man are a mystery. The Brothers Karamazov has the mysticism of the Resurrection.
From [his near execution] onward, [Doestoevsky] saw the world from the standpoint of death, that is to say, from the standpoint of eternity...He remained in our world as a man come from elsewhere.
Chapter 1: The Search for a New Man
How does a Christian respond to all the world's hope for a "new man"?
- 1: "Christianity [and Christian humanism] cannot be a 'fashionable' doctrine: that is the difference between it and doctrines that come and go."
- 2: Modern science is ordered toward the possession of the world and the transformation of society.
- 3 (★): "Don't throw the baby out with the bath water", or unilateral criticism is lazy. "The life of anyone who wants to be faithful will, until the end of time, be 'contradiction and struggle.'" We should reject false or absolute conceptions of science, but science itself is a tool that allows us to act in the image of God as creator. We need to practice careful discernment.
- Christian appropriation: "We will not let ourselves be manipulated by the adversary to the point of blindly taking the opposite position of his in everything, leaving him thus the full benefit of the sound ideas that he mixes in with his rebellion." (419)
- "Time is given to man to in order to perfect himself within the temporal order." (419)
- 4: "In order to understand time and the world, it is necessary to focus beyond." (429)
- 5: Marxism aims to return the possession of man to himself by freeing him from the transcendent. Marxism is a complete doctrine: you can't just pick and choose from it without unintended consequences.
- 6: A misunderstanding of man is our greatest temptation and the most terrible threat, and the cause of this is spiritual.
- 7: Christianity, with its conception of man, comes to give hope to the world.
- "The universe has a meaning to which man is the key...We must here on earth serve our apprenticeship for our future condition." (452-3)
- The ills of man come not from politics, but from sin—man will not be liberated by some intellectual, political, or economic process
- 8: We must take responsibility for the work we do, but then receive as a gift from God the Day of the Lord
Chapter 2: Nietzsche as Mystic
Nietzsche's thought is everywhere today, but even in his tragic blindness he is a prophet
- He is quite bombastic and sees himself as the rival and successor to Jesus. This leads to his Eternal Return (effectively his attempt at a "European Buddhism")
- Despite his confidence in himself, some questions arise: How did he trick himself into thinking his ideas were new? How did he not see how oppressive they are? How did he not see their contradictions when he is so good at pointing those out in others?
- Nietzsche wants to kill God but knows he must put something in his place: hence the Eternal Return: "he who refuses to believe that the universe is marked by a circular process is constrained to believe in a sovereign absolute God" (496)
- "Since he was not able to be Christ, he blasphemed against Christ...His doctrine is that of the weak who aspire to be strong, but certainly not of the strong who are truly so in reality!"
- The cries of Zarathustra are merely the cries of human confusion: Nietzsche destroys himself.
- Madj, Christmas 2021
- Brenden Rhatican
<a href="../notes/bib.html">bib</a> file:(~The Drama of Atheist Humanism)