Summa Theologiae by St. Thomas Aquinas

(Green Bay: Aquinas Institute, 1274/2012)

!2019-01-10-A Shorter Summa

Resources

Topical outline:

Physical text:

Read online:

Outline

FIRST PART (QQ. 1-119)

FIRST PART OF THE SECOND PART (QQ. 1-114)

SECOND PART OF THE SECOND PART (QQ. 1-189)

THIRD PART (QQ. 1-90)

SUPPLEMENT (QQ. 1-99)

Notes

  • 2021-10-22-Fri: Memory in ST IIa-IIae Q. 49, A. 1 (Secunda Secundae, from Memorize the Gospel of John!)
    • "Prudence requires the memory of many things. Hence memory is fittingly accounted a part of prudence."
    • "There are four things whereby a man perfects his memory":
      1. take suitable yet unwonted illustration
      2. carefully consider and set in order
      3. be anxious and earnest about the things we wish to remember
      4. often reflect on the things we wish to remember
  • 2024-07-23-Tue: In Jos-02-5, Rahab lies to protect the Jewish spies—does this condone the classic moral example of lying to Nazis to protect hidden jews? Thomas addresses this in ST IIa-IIae, Q. 110, A. 3, Obj. 4: "It is not lawful to tell a lie in order to deliver another from any danger whatever. Nevertheless it is lawful to hide the truth prudently, by keeping it back, as Augustine says (Contra Mend. x)." (from 2024-09-15-Bible in a Year)
  • 2024-11-05-Tue: Henry asked if it was ok for Fr. Kapaun to steal food to survive. "If the need be so manifest and urgent then it is lawful for a man to succor his own need by means of another's property, by taking it either openly or secretly: nor is this properly speaking theft or robbery." (ST IIa-IIae Q. 66, A. 7)
  • 2024-11-19-Tue: Logic student asked Are Angels Alive?. Thomas indicates "no" in ST I Q. 51, A. 3
  • 2024-12-07-Sat: Discussed what man's happiness consists in for CCD from ST IIa-IIae Q. 2, A, 1 (wealth), 4 (power), 6 (pleasure)
  • 2024-12-08-Sun: Henry asked about resurrection of the body after the major relics of Thomas Aquinas visited St. Patrick Church:
    • ST Suppl. IIIae, Q. 86, A. 1: Whether the bodies of the damned will rise again with their deformities?
      • 1 Cor-15: "The dead shall rise again incorruptible
      • "all bodies of both wicked and good will rise again whole"
    • ST Suppl. IIIae, Q. 75, A. 1: Whether there is to be a resurrection of the body?
      • Jb-19-26: "I know that my Redeemer liveth, and in the last day I shall rise out of the earth, and I shall be clothed again with my skin," etc. Therefore there will be a resurrection of the body.
    • ST Suppl. IIIae, Q. 80, A. 2: Whether the hair and nails will rise again in the human body?
      • Lk-21: "A hair of your head shall not perish."
      • "since man will rise again with all the perfections of his nature, it follows that hair and nails will rise again in him"
    • CCC 990: The "resurrection of the flesh" (the literal formulation of the Apostles' Creed) means not only that the immortal soul will live on after death, but that even our "mortal body" will come to life again.

Resources

Books

How to Read the Summa

Email from Fr. Raymund Snyder, OP, 2021-08-07:

Glad to hear you got My Way of Life. Your idea is exactly what I would recommend. If you read through My Way of Life it will give you a broad overview. Then you’ll be able to go deeper with what interests you but also have some general knowledge of the whole. I don’t doubt Fr. Farrell took some liberties in paraphrasing and grouping together large sections of the Summa without precise references. His much longer work Companion to the Summa (several volumes) was more of a commentary.

Some thoughts on reading the Summa itself:

When you do turn to the Summa I would encourage you to read the articles where the question is of interest. For any given question (i.e. a grouping of 4-12 articles or sub-questions), there may only be 3-4 that seem interesting and the others seem either just basic an obvious or too technical or just boring. Just skip through. Some articles are worth reading five times over (because they are so important) before you even bother with others.

Remember that the sed contra does not necessarily represent what St. Thomas thinks but is just a dialectical push back from an authority. It’s a common mistake people make in thinking the sed contra is really Thomas speaking as Thomas. He only really gives his own position in the respondeo (usually later on in the respondeo) and responses to the objections.

Some of the best material is actually in the responses to the objections. I recommend reading the question, then the sed contra and respondeo. Then read the first objection (not to understand it in detail but just the general path of the objection) and then read the Ad 1. Then read Obj. 2 and go down to Ad 2.

If you get the point where you can easily hold more ideas in your head at once from a Summa article you could start reading them straight through, but admittedly that’s sort of difficult especially when there are more than 2-3 objections. By the time you get to the bottom you can’t remember what the objection were.

Article with an interesting idea of how to read the Summa: A better way of reading the Summa Theologica

Created: 2021-08-12
Updated: 2024-12-09-Mon